Wednesday, May 4, 2016

A Note on American Reactionary Politics


The uncanny of real experiences....invariably accords with our attempted solution and can be traced back every time to something that was once familiar and then repressed. Sigmund Freud


The specter of Barry Goldwater haunts the GOP. Goldwater’s stance against the Civil Rights Act forged an alliance of anti-regulation money and the undereducated ultra-nationalist, fundamentalist, and racist white male. Solidified by Nixon’s Southern Strategy, bloated by gerrymandered redistricting, the GOP transformed LBJ’s Southern Democrats into Republicans. Heedless of failed promises to working class voters, the elites, both Democrat and Republican, did well. Meanwhile Democrats, hardly less beholden to big money, championed the interests of a diverse group of the disenfranchised at the expense of the white lower middle class. The markets rose and the privileged maintained and expanded capital with thanks to Reagan, Clinton, and their allies. The GOP, with only lip service opposition from the Democrats, maintained a grip on the economic agenda, thinking they could keep their Tea Party polite. These folk, feeling no advantage beyond nativism and whiteness, became more and more aggrieved. And then we elected and re-elected a Black president with a Muslim name and the pawns of the GOP lost it and rebelled. 




Here's my un-nuanced sense of the abused and aggrieved core of the GOP, a group of maybe 20-25% of the overall electorate. Not enough to win the presidency without additional support, but more than enough to make national life ugly. What turns white conservatives reactionary? Their perception that too many non whites are getting a piece of their pie. This is the heart of Trump's base. What makes religious conservatives reactionary? An uncanny and confused confrontation with the sanctioned transgression of enfranchised gays, uppity women, and gender benders feeling it's time to come out of the shadows. Cruz country. Trump and Cruz's core supporters overlap and share a hyper-defensive us violated by them. They finally chose Trump, the bigger bully, who encouraged impotent whites to share his narcissistic desire to tower. They're going to get screwed again, but more organized and rankled with neo-fascist frustration, entitlement, and aggression. We're in for a very dark rough ride.


What's Sanctioned Transgression and Uncanny Dread?

Let's make America great again or, the return of the repressed. 

Sex, gender, race, and family relations have always been subject to religion and state attempts to limit what people are permitted to feel and do. Sanctioned transgression concerns enhanced social or legal protection for behaviors and relationships a dominant group has previously kept forbidden. When legal protection is sought or offered for these "transgressions", taboos are less hidden, even celebrated. This doesn't sit well with the deeply defensive. It is especially problematic when it evokes a person's suppressed urges now openly exhibited in others. Freud called this the return of the repressed. It should come as no surprise that anxious dread surfaces in people unprepared to manage these feelings; nor is it a surprise these feelings are treated as provocation to assault the source of threat. So why Trump over Cruz? I suspect it's because Trump encourages attack, a position of strength that feels better than Cruz's creepy discomfort. 






Here's a somewhat more nuanced view and some problems with neutrality: Politics and Religion: Psychotherapy's third rail.
A posting on the behavioral logic of social progress and reaction: Why Marriage Equality (was) Inevitable.  And Empathy, Inclusion, and Moral Dialog or What Gets in the Way of Negotiating Social Justice?





5 comments:

  1. "Meanwhile the Democrats, hardly less beholden to big money, championed the interests of a diverse group of the disenfranchised at the expense of the white lower middle class." Beholden, yes. Terribly so. But the white lower-middle class are also among disenfranchised, and benefits as much as the rest of us from the programs that the Democrats champion and Republicans promise to dismantle. So I can't see those programs as being at the expense of one race of lower-middle class people more than another. (Affirmative action is a possible exception, though a rather exaggerated one in my opinion.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. As for the scary, uncanny part, yeah. It's not just the Trump fanboys beating on protesters, it's the crowd cheering them on, and Trump not saying a word to stop the violence. Quite the contrary, he calls the protestors "despicable people" and even "not people." Think about that. "Not people." I pray we don't get there, but in that direction lies genocide.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The goldmine here is "sanctioned transgression". If you will outline first what qualifies (to them) as transgression, then follow up with "sanctioned", you'll have a post that explains.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, I've added a brief comment with more to follow.

      Delete
  4. Cj Stone I think I see it more as status dynamics. For instance, women *should* want to have children. Women who don't are doing it wrong. We'll allow a little eccentricity, but if they are actively preventing children (contraception), then it's not merely an idea. Rather, they are going against what's natural. Remembering a fetus has the status "there by gods' will", if a woman becomes pregnant and then tries to kill it (abortion), she is not merely odd, she is going against the gods (status assignment). People who go against the natural order and against the gods' will are transgressors (critique; has motivational significance). If we don't act against them, we are sanctioning this transgression and are equally culpable (critique); therefore, we must pass laws against contraception, against abortion (even in the case of rape/health of mother because the status of a baby is "there by gods' will" under ALL circumstances), and so forth. If other transgressors are sanctioning women and preventing us from changing the laws, we must do things not expressly forbidden by their sanction that make it as hard as possible to do these transgressive things (unnecessary procedures and waiting periods, building codes, doctor requirements, etc.). We thereby honor the gods' will; and prevent these transgressors and the people who sanction them from continuing with what is not merely pathology and not merely morally bankrupt behavior, but literally opposing the gods.

    Similar applications to gay marriage and this toilet nonsense. There might be a reverse for "gunhuggers" (that is, we non-huggers don't see the transgressions the huggers need to protect themselves from).

    ReplyDelete